Kia ora, my name is Hannah Burton. I am the Creative Space and Extension teacher at Pt England School in Auckland, New Zealand. I began teaching at Pt England School in 2016 and am now in my 9th year here. During this time, I have been in the Manaiakalani Digital Teacher Academy, been a Manaiakalani-Google Class OnAir teacher, a Manaiakalani Innovative Teacher and a within-school Kahui ako (CoL) teacher.
A focus on critical thinking and causal reasoning when responding to texts will support increased levels of critical thinking and ability to create causal links in online written interactions with others for year 5 children reading between 10 and 12 years.
After implementing use of Peter Worley's framework, The Concept Box, into reading lessons, I collected data to compare with the data I collected at the beginning of the year. Graphs from the beginning of the year are also in these slides to make comparisons.
Below are a number of resources which I found particularly useful around teaching critical thinking. The coral coloured boxes look at critical thinking in general, where as the blue boxes share links to articles making a connection between critical thinking in a digital/creative environment.
The children who have been using The Concept Box in their reading groups are really motivated and now know the routine when it comes to reading. One challenge I have is how I focus in on the children's decoding whilst using The Concept Box framework. Technically, children reading at their level (reading age 10-11) should have strong decoding however I have begun to notice that some of these children are still having difficulty with simple decoding. I have attempted to hear the children read during the time they are silently reading however this means we then don't have enough time to do a good job of the Concept Box.
Teaching critical thinking is something which takes time. Going forward, teachers who use the Concept Box in reading may have to ensure that at least one lesson a week has a decoding focus while another lesson has a focus on the Concept Box. This will come with other limitations as it will mean that reading mileage may reduce as children will be reading less texts with the teacher per week.
This afternoon, we had our annual Bursts and Bubbles function where all of the 2020 CoL teachers presented a snapshot of their 2020 Inquiry. Here is my 3 minute presentation.
Transcript:
During Lockdown, we were learning about food from Canada. A child disappeared from the google meet and then reappeared with a bottle of maple-flavoured syrup. “Maple syrup comes from Canada!” he stated. Another child said, “That’s not real maple syrup.” And that was the extent of the discussion.
Both children were correct. The bottle quite clearly said “Maple flavoured syrup.” However, there was no critical thinking to explain why. In fact, when I tried to initiate critical thinking, the second child could still not explain how he knew it wasn’t real maple syrup. So what does this mean?
This is just one example of the lack of critical thinking observed in some of our year 5 children who are working beyond their chronological age in reading.
Critical thinking is an aspect of learning which stretches across the curriculum, including the key competencies, however it is a skill which many of our children could do better at and which we could do a better job of teaching.
I identified this as my focus when I noticed that those children who are better readers tend to be better critical thinkers and those children who are better writers tend to be better critical thinkers. The problem with some of our children who are strong readers is that they don’t reciprocate this strong academic level in their writing and as a result, critical thinking is actually not as strong as we would expect.
I identified that children in year 5 who are reading above their chronological age tend to fall into two categories. All of these children already know how to read. One group can independently read to learn and tend to be able to create causal relationships and put ideas from texts into their own words where as the other group are still learning how to do this. I wanted to focus on this second group of children.
Profiling of my teaching showed that I had strengths in using talk moves to encourage children’s thinking. However, a reliance on me made me realise I needed to be using other strategies to encourage higher level causal links to be made by the children. Therefore, I changed the structure of reading lessons so the children would no longer solely rely on me.
After exploring research into critical thinking by Richard Anderson, I researched and implemented a framework called The Concept Box by Peter Worley. The Concept Box framework is a teaching strategy which incorporates vocab acquisition, discussions and argumentation in order to get children thinking critically. Children are first asked to share any ideas they have about what they have read. Once their ideas are flowing, the children have to think of individual words to represent ideas in the text. The children are then encouraged to discuss which of these words are the most important to convey the more critical elements of the text. Through this process, the children eliminate words if they are not sufficient to the deeper ideas being explored.
In the story, The Lion King, one child stated, “The word ‘Lion’ shouldn’t be there because it doesn’t go deep enough.” Another child decided the word ‘sad’ did not do a good job of explaining the story but did not give a reason. A child responded by saying, “Wait. You need to have a reason. You can't just take it out." This is evidence that some children are identifying when others are not thinking critically.
Children felt that using the Concept Box framework encouraged them to listen, explain, learn new vocab, make sense and think deeper. While some children are still challenged with the concept, there are more children in the group who are beginning to lead and support others and I have begun noticing a shift where the children are doing the job of guiding their thinking.
I have learned that our children need a strong framework, like The Concept Box, which can be used with a range of texts to support development of critical thinking.
As part of my inquiry into critical thinking, I have compared blog comments written at the beginning of the year and at the end of the year.
I used this blog commenting rubric to score comments:
Children who participated in the Concept Box Framework Sessions regularly: A, B, D, F, J Children who participated in the Concept Box Framework Sessions more recently: G, I, K, L
This first graph shows levels of critical thinking and interpersonal skills at the beginning of the year.
This second graph shows levels of critical thinking and interpersonal skills at the end of the year. On the whole, level of critical thinking and interpersonal skills in blog comments progressed.
This third graph shows a comparison in the level of critical thinking seen in blog comments (beginning of year to end of year). All 5 of the children who made progress in level of critical thinking, participated in the Concept Box Framework lessons.
This forth graph shows a comparison in the level of interpersonal skills seen in blog comments (beginning of year to end of year).
